FACEBOOK: CENSURE FOR PUBLICATIONS ABOUT NATO

Facebook blocked our Facebook Page after publications about NATO.  Our Server  and blog were also blocked for a while.  Strange in this case is that a certain Debbie-Anne (unknown to us) bombarded us with many Facebook people we did not know. She introduced them as ‘friends’. One of these people we accepted as ”friend”, seemed to be a Libyan NATO collaborator. We published a number of issues on the NATO on his Facebook page…

Some weeks ago, Facebook blocked us and deleted  a photo montage of Barack Obama that
we found some months ago when the media announced Osama bin Laden (in
the press erroneously called Obama bin Laden) was murdered.  Facebook deleted also our commentary: ‘Obama was a terrorist – Three days after NATO intervened in Libya, the cost to
U.S. taxpayers has reached hundreds of millions of dollars and continued to climb. 14% of the Americans live in poverty. America needs a regime change‘.

HERE IS OUR FACEBOOK ADDRESS IF FACEBOOK HAS NOT CLOSED THIS PAGE AND DELETED ALL THE INFORMATION AGAIN:

http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/Jan-Boeykens/100002180824569

Advertisements

One thought on “FACEBOOK: CENSURE FOR PUBLICATIONS ABOUT NATO

  1. kruitvat Post author

    CENSURE…
    Russia and China resist U.N. efforts to censure Syria
    Posted By Colum Lynch Tuesday, December 13, 2011

    Add another name to Syria’s growing enemies list: Barbara Walters.

    Syria’s U.N. envoy, Bashar Jaafari, denounced the ABC broadcaster’s handling of a prime time interview she conducted with President Bashar al-Assad, the first by an American television journalist since public protests began threatening the Syrian leader’s rule.

    “She distorted the truth,” he told reporters outside the Security Council late on Monday. “We gave her the opportunity to interview the president for 59 minutes and she aired only 20 minutes.” Walters, he protested, edited out “all the positive answers.”

    The blast against Walters came on a day when Syria faced mounting international pressure to halt its crackdown on protesters. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay accused the Syrian government of deliberately killing and torturing thousands of civilians during the anti government protests.

    The confidential briefing, which was obtained by Turtle Bay, alleged that Syrian authorities have killed more than 5,000 civilians, military defectors, and security agents that have refused orders to kill civilians.

    “The situation is intolerable,” she said. “The nature and scale of abuses committed by Syrian forces since March indicate that crimes against humanity are likely to have been committed.”

    In response, Jaafari lashed out at Pillay, saying the high commissioner for human rights had violated “the honor of her office” by meddling in the internal affairs of a U.N. member state, and relying on accounts of military defectors. “Mrs. Pillay … is not objective, she is not fair … she has trespassed her mandate, she allowed herself to be misused.”

    The exchange capped a day of recriminations and finger pointing in the Security Council. Jaafari said his country was a victim of a “huge conspiracy” concocted by the United States, Europe’s former colonial powers, Israel, and the armed Syrian opposition forces fighting the government.

    Russia’s U.N. envoy Vitaly Churkin partly agreed, saying that the Western powers are seeking to topple Assad’s government.

    “We think this is very dangerous,” Churkin said. “They make no secret of the fact that they want regime change.” Churkin also accused his Western partners of trying to bully him into rejecting a proposal by China to have Pillay expand the briefing to cover human rights abuses in Palestinian territories. “I saw every trick in the book thrown at me short of trying to strangulate the president of the council,” Churkin said.

    U.S. and European diplomats denied that they tried to block a discussion of Palestinian rights, which they characterized as a cynical attempt by Syria’s defenders to detract attention from Damascus’s conduct — which one U.N. diplomat characterized as “the most horrifying briefing that we’ve had in the Security Council over the last two years.”

    “We find it unconscionable that the Security Council has not spoken out on this issue in recent months given everything that has happened,” said Rosemary DiCarlo, the U.S. deputy permanent representative to the United Nations. “We really need to see the Security Council on the right side of history here, to stand with the Syrian people.”

    Privately, council diplomats noted that China and Russia, which have traditionally resisted discussions of human rights in the Security Council, have never before asked for a briefing by the human rights chief on Palestine, or on any other human rights crisis.

    “This is a complete red herring,” said Britain’s U.N. ambassador Mark Lyall Grant.

    “This was a very transparent ploy by those countries that did not want to hear Ms. Pillay’s briefing on Syria. There has never been a request for her to come and brief on Palestine before,” he added. “Indeed, the newfound enthusiasm on the part of some of our colleagues who have traditionally opposed any briefing by the high commissioner for human rights in the Security Council seems now to have ended, and I would certainly anticipate that Ms. Pillay will be invited a number of times back to the Security Council to brief on human rights in a number of places across the world in the future.”

    While the heated diplomatic rhetoric in the Security Council probably served to keep the public conversation on Syria alive, it did little to break the diplomatic logjam in the council on a way forward.

    While the U.N. Security Council in August adopted a non-binding statement condemning Syria’s repression, it has not been able to apply further pressure on Syria. China and Russia vetoed a U.S.- and European-backed resolution that would have threatened possible sanctions against Syria.

    The prospects for a breakthrough now rest in the hands of the Arab League, which has imposed its own set of sanctions on Syria, and which will be holding a series of meetings with European governments to determine if it will back a Security Council resolution on Syria — a move that would raise the political costs of another veto. “We are in regular consultations with the Arab ambassadors here in New York, as are our capitals with Arab capitals in the region and in the light of those decisions that they take over the next few days we shall certainly consider when, and how, and in what terms to come back to the Security Council,” said Lyall Grant.

    Follow me on Twitter @columlynch
    http://turtlebay.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/12/13/russia_china_un_syria_human_rights

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s